HomeSpecial ReportNew Research: The True Cost of a Bad Sales Hire

New Research: The True Cost of a Bad Sales Hire

Hiring a salesperson feels like a growth decision. You’re investing in revenue, momentum and market expansion. But when that hire goes wrong, the impact isn’t just disappointing — it’s expensive, disruptive and often far- reaching in ways that leaders underestimate. A bad sales hire doesn’t simply fail to produce. They actively drain resources, distort forecasts, and can damage your brand. Let’s break down what this means.

How to Understand the True Cost of a Bad Hire

Organizations incur both direct and indirect costs in the sales hiring process. When the new hire doesn’t progress as expected those expenses cannot be recovered. There is no ROI. In fact, true costs can spiral out of control if the bad hire impacts the motivation and mindset of the existing salesforce.

The Recruiting Process

The Search

Every search for a top rainmaker costs a business money. Leadership may choose to use a recruiting agency, which comes with a placement fee. Another direct cost comes in the form of advertising the business buys.

Interviews

HR personnel and sales managers conduct interviews as part of the hiring process. These interviews may include the top three candidates, and more than one round of interviews is usually necessary. The time spent on these interviews takes away from other productive tasks. Managers could be coaching sales team members or helping them close deals.

Onboarding

Most businesses invest heavily in onboarding their new reps. They may send the rep offsite for training. Or the training may be offered in-house. The cost of training is real.

Identifying and Recognizing Problems

Initial Performance

By the time the new rep is ready to start selling, the typical manager has invested close to 3 months on the hiring process. And in our Voice of the Sales Manager survey, managers told us they need an additional 5.5 months to bring their new hire up to the performance speed of other reps in the department. During the ramp-up time, managers may set low quotas compared to what they expect from other team members. At this point, the new rep’s less-than-stellar performance won’t be obvious.

Slow Response

Once the rep has been with the company for 6 months, managers may be slow to notice poor performance. The new hire may have a charming personality and have formed friendships with co-workers, leaving the manager to believe they have strengthened the team. These factors contribute to slow corrective action by managers. When they first learn that their new hire made false promises to a customer, they’ll consider it a newbie mistake. If mistakes keep happening, the manager will coach the new employee. The managerial mindset at this point is often about protecting the investment that they made in the employee. Some managers fear their hiring mistake will be discovered and they’ll try to cover it up by continuing to invest in the poorly performing employee. Sooner or later, managers will accept that their new sales rep is not working out. After months of coaching and encouragement, the rep hasn’t come close to meeting quota. Even worse, team members may grumble that they resent having to pick up the slack.

The Exit

Depending on the organization, the sales manager may need several weeks or months to complete the exit of their bad sales hire. For example, HR might get involved to protect the company against a wrongful termination suit. After that, they should do a debrief to avoid making another mistake. And they should investigate a different kind of hiring process.

A Better Sales Hiring Process

A better sales hiring process starts with using psychometric assessments and sales acumen tests. The best platforms, such as TeamTrait™, allow hiring managers to measure a candidate’s fit with the specific position and with the manager. The objective data points from assessments train managers to value competence over charisma. Using assessments may feel impersonal. And that’s the point. Hiring decisions shouldn’t be emotional. With assessment data, managers can shift their mindset away from the interview performance to how qualified a candidate is in terms of selling.

Hiring managers should ask candidates to take a pre-hire assessment or a sales acumen situational judgement test such as the one offered by TeamTrait before the interview phase. Our Voice of the Sales Manager survey results indicate that 45% of sales managers use sales skills assessment tests to evaluate sales candidates. And around 27% rely on pre-hire behavioral/personality assessments.

Improved sales hiring outcomes are the bonus for businesses that use assessments. For everyone else, relying on gut instinct or recommendations from “friends” leads to bad sales hires and considerable expense. Our calculations estimate the average cost of a bad B2B sales hire in the United States at $177,171. This figure can be significantly higher in certain verticals, particularly in enterprise, medical device, pharmaceutical, and cybersecurity sales, where complexity and larger contract sizes drive higher compensation. As sales cycles lengthen, earnings increase accordingly. All these factors increase the costs of a bad sales hire.

There’s no denying that B2B sales professionals need sterling credibility and skills. You can effectively manage the risk of bad sales hires in your organization by using pre-hire sales assessments.

Author

  • Kathy Crosett

    Kathy Crosett is the vice president of research for SalesFuel. She holds an MBA from the University of Vermont and oversees a staff of researchers, writers and content providers for SalesFuel. Previously, she was co-owner of several small businesses in the health care services sector.

    View all posts

Get our newsletter and digital focus reports

Stay current on learning and development trends, best practices, research, new products and technologies, case studies and much more.

Kathy Crosett
Kathy Crosetthttps://salesfuel.com/
Kathy Crosett is the vice president of research for SalesFuel. She holds an MBA from the University of Vermont and oversees a staff of researchers, writers and content providers for SalesFuel. Previously, she was co-owner of several small businesses in the health care services sector.

Online Partners